+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. They are watching you NetworkNewb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Off the grid
    Posts
    2,962

    Certifications
    A+/Net+/Sec+, CCENT, CCNA:Sec, CCSK, GCIH
    #1

    Default Beating applicant tracking systems, resume advice

    Just saw this article and thought it was interesting. Might find a couple tweeks you might not thought of that need to be done in your resume. ie. using certain fonts or what is the image of your bullet points.

    https://www.cio.com/article/2398753/...g-systems.html

    Edit: I got negative rep for sharing this? Tough crowd ��
    Last edited by NetworkNewb; 05-08-2018 at 11:41 PM.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  2. SS
  3. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    467

    Certifications
    VCP5-DCV, CCNA R&S, VCA6-DCV
    #2
    Thanks for the link, great tips indeed. My wife actually shared similar info with me previously but we can't remember where it was from.

    Another great way to avoid automated systems: LinkedIn... and let the recruiters put you in front of the line.

    I'm currently far along an interviewing process and I never sent in a resume lol, I guess my linkedin and charm in the first couple of interviews were more than enough. And this is with the second largest private company in the USA.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  4. Senior Member cyberguypr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,211

    Certifications
    GCFE, GCED, GCIH, CISSP, CCSP, and others that should never be mentioned
    #3
    I have my serious doubt on the serif vs. sans serif issue. This may have been a thing back in the early 2010s but I seriously doubt this is a thing in 2018. Most ATS I've seen spit back the extracted info to you for approval before submitting, so you would notice something missing if you used serif fonts and they were parsed incorrectly. If anyone has any solid evidence that this is prevalent, I would love to see/hear it.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  5. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,130

    Certifications
    Too many MCPs and MCTS, MCSA: Security, MCSE: Security, MCSA: 2003, 2008, 2012, MCITP: EA, CISSP-ISSAP, SCS DLP, GREM
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by cyberguypr View Post
    I have my serious doubt on the serif vs. sans serif issue. This may have been a thing back in the early 2010s but I seriously doubt this is a thing in 2018. Most ATS I've seen spit back the extracted info to you for approval before submitting, so you would notice something missing if you used serif fonts and they were parsed incorrectly. If anyone has any solid evidence that this is prevalent, I would love to see/hear it.
    Beat me to it! Didn't read after this paragraph, came back here to express my doubts, sounds like complete BS.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  6. They are watching you NetworkNewb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Off the grid
    Posts
    2,962

    Certifications
    A+/Net+/Sec+, CCENT, CCNA:Sec, CCSK, GCIH
    #5
    Yea, probably true... pretty simple thing to play safe tho
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  7. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    176

    Certifications
    ITIL v3, Security+, Network+, Project+, A+
    #6
    One thing you have to consider (and be concerned about) is when you have your resume parsed for information and the only thing it takes is school and past work experience. Often times the systems don't even have a section for skills, certifications, etc so all of this information is "lost" when the lazy human resources professional logs into their ATS and says "nope, no matches today, still looking!". if that's the case, you need to take your skills section and plug them into your past work experiences so you can get credit for them.

    I can't stand HRIS systems. They breed laziness and incompetence among human resource professional. They give the good HR people a bad name and the bad HR people look competent. Meanwhile qualified applicants get missed left and right.
    [2018] - A+ 901 (PASS), A+ 902 (PASS), Project+ (PASS), Security+ (PASS), Network+(PASS), CySA, Cloud+
    [2018/2019] - MBA - IT Management - WGU

    HR: “What if we train them and they leave?”
    ME: “What if we don’t train them and they stay?”
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  8. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    466

    Certifications
    CCNET, CCNA R&S, ITIL, MCP, Security+
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Squished View Post
    I can't stand HRIS systems. They breed laziness and incompetence among human resource professional. They give the good HR people a bad name and the bad HR people look competent. Meanwhile qualified applicants get missed left and right.
    I've met only one competent HR person in my career. The rest can fog a mirror and that is about it. Where are these so called "good" HR people? Are they unicorns?
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  9. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    176

    Certifications
    ITIL v3, Security+, Network+, Project+, A+
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by NavyMooseCCNA View Post
    I've met only one competent HR person in my career. The rest can fog a mirror and that is about it. Where are these so called "good" HR people? Are they unicorns?
    I agree with you. I had ONE many years back. The rest are all incompetent and LAZY. My god are they lazy.
    [2018] - A+ 901 (PASS), A+ 902 (PASS), Project+ (PASS), Security+ (PASS), Network+(PASS), CySA, Cloud+
    [2018/2019] - MBA - IT Management - WGU

    HR: “What if we train them and they leave?”
    ME: “What if we don’t train them and they stay?”
    Reply With Quote Quote  

+ Reply to Thread

Social Networking & Bookmarks